What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.


The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues.  safe distance from cell tower  is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For  https://rentry.co/k5wp6 , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.